Medical Devices

Build an always-ready agentic medical device lifecycle.

Automatan is the AI operating layer for MedTech—coordinating specialized agents across regulatory strategy, design controls, clinical evidence, quality systems, audit readiness, regulatory change, and post-market surveillance.

AI-powered medical device lifecycle and regulatory operations dashboard
Why now

Medical-device complexity has outgrown periodic review.

Medical device companies operate across expanding product portfolios, evolving global requirements, interconnected quality systems, and growing volumes of lifecycle evidence. Yet critical decisions still depend on experts manually searching controlled documents, comparing regulatory requirements, reconstructing traceability, and preparing for audits at fixed points in time. AI agents create a new operating model: continuous analysis of the requirements, evidence, controls, and risks surrounding every device.

01
Global regulation

Every market creates a different evidence path.

FDA requirements, EU MDR, IVDR, ISO 13485, MDSAP, FDA QMSR, and market-specific obligations create overlapping—but not identical—expectations across products and jurisdictions.

02
Lifecycle evidence

Device truth is distributed across thousands of records.

Design inputs, risk files, verification and validation reports, clinical evidence, supplier records, CAPAs, complaints, labeling, DHFs, DMRs, and DHRs rarely exist in one connected evidence environment.

03
Quality assurance

Audit readiness cannot begin when an audit is announced.

Missing approvals, broken traceability, outdated procedures, unresolved findings, and incomplete objective evidence must be identified continuously—not during inspection preparation.

04
Post-market responsibility

New field evidence can change the device risk picture.

Complaints, adverse events, recurring failures, supplier issues, and regulatory updates must be evaluated against existing risk controls, clinical conclusions, and quality-system records.

The next generation of MedTech companies will not manage compliance document by document. They will continuously understand the complete evidence system surrounding every device.

Book Demo
Agentic MedTech workflows

What changes when agents reason across the device lifecycle

The workflows medical device companies transform first—from regulatory pathway decisions to continuous quality and post-market assurance.

Regulatory Strategy and Market Authorization

Build the evidence path before building the submission

Regulatory Strategy and Evidence Reasoning Agents analyze device classification, intended use, technological characteristics, predicate similarity, AI/ML signals, combination-product considerations, market requirements, design inputs, and anticipated risk controls. They map potential pathways—including 510(k), De Novo, PMA, EU MDR, and IVDR routes—then identify submission requirements, evidence expectations, unresolved questions, and market-authorization dependencies.

BeforeTeams manually interpret regulations, guidance, device documentation, and prior submissions across separate sources. Pathway assumptions and evidence gaps may remain undiscovered until development or submission is already advanced.
AfterLeadership receives an evidence-backed regulatory pathway map with applicable requirements, comparable device considerations, missing inputs, clinical and technical evidence needs, major risks, and recommended review areas.
Agent workflow for medical device regulatory strategy and market authorization
QMS, Evidence and Audit Assurance

Keep every quality record connected to what it must prove

Quality Documentation, Clinical Evidence, Risk Assessment, and Audit Readiness Agents analyze quality manuals, SOPs, work instructions, DHFs, DMRs, DHRs, risk-management files, CAPAs, nonconformances, validation records, clinical documentation, labeling, and supplier evidence. They detect missing requirements, inconsistent records, weak traceability, incomplete approvals, unsupported conclusions, and gaps between procedures and objective evidence.

BeforeQuality and regulatory teams prepare for inspections by searching repositories, requesting records from multiple functions, reconciling versions, and manually verifying whether the required evidence exists.
AfterTeams receive continuous readiness assessments across design controls, manufacturing records, clinical evidence, supplier quality, risk management, CAPA, and document control—with each finding traced to the relevant requirement and source record.
Agent workflow for medical device quality management and audit assurance
Regulatory Change and Post-Market Governance

Connect every new requirement and safety signal to its lifecycle impact

Regulatory Change, Multi-Standard Compliance, and Post-Market Surveillance Agents evaluate FDA guidance, QMSR requirements, ISO revisions, MDR and IVDR obligations, complaints, adverse events, field-performance data, and emerging safety patterns. They map changes and signals to affected devices, procedures, controls, risk files, clinical evidence, labeling, suppliers, and market authorizations.

BeforeRegulatory changes and post-market signals are assessed through separate projects. Teams manually determine which products, procedures, documents, controls, and submissions may be affected.
AfterEvery change or safety signal produces a structured impact assessment with affected requirements, device records, evidence gaps, risk implications, accountable functions, and recommended actions.
Agent workflow for regulatory change and medical device post-market governance

See these agentic MedTech workflows operating across your device documentation, quality system, and regulatory evidence.

Book Demo
How it fits

The regulatory reasoning layer across your MedTech systems

Your eQMS, document management, PLM, regulatory, clinical, laboratory, manufacturing, and post-market systems maintain records and workflows. Automatan operates across the evidence inside them—connecting requirements, controlled documents, device records, quality events, clinical conclusions, and risk signals. No rip-and-replace. Existing systems remain the sources of record. Automatan becomes the AI operating layer for understanding the complete medical device lifecycle.

Medical device systems connecting to Automatan agents and human regulatory teams

Connects the device evidence chain

Bring together regulatory requirements, design inputs and outputs, verification and validation evidence, risk controls, clinical records, labeling, supplier documentation, manufacturing history, CAPAs, complaints, and post-market data.

Orchestrates specialized MedTech agents

Deploy coordinated agents for regulatory strategy, QMS analysis, clinical evidence review, audit readiness, regulatory change assessment, multi-standard mapping, risk evaluation, and post-market surveillance.

Preserves expert authority and traceability

Agents identify, compare, map, and recommend. Regulatory, Quality, Clinical, Engineering, and Safety professionals retain control over interpretations, approvals, submissions, quality decisions, and patient-impacting actions. Every material finding can remain connected to its source requirement, document version, supporting evidence, and review status.

Built for regulated product environments

Medical device documentation contains controlled product information, clinical evidence, risk decisions, manufacturing records, supplier data, and post-market safety information. Automatan brings enterprise security, access governance, evidence traceability, and auditability to every agentic MedTech workflow.

SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
GDPR
Data residency across US, EU, and APAC
AES-256 and TLS 1.3
SSO and SCIM
Detailed audit trail
Customer-managed keys
Visit the Trust Center →
Business outcomes

Turn regulatory complexity into lifecycle advantage.

Automatan helps medical device companies accelerate market access, strengthen quality assurance, and scale compliance across products and jurisdictions—without increasing manual review at the same rate.

Market access

Reach submission readiness with fewer late-stage surprises

Map regulatory pathways earlier, clarify market-specific expectations, assess predicate similarity, evaluate design-input completeness, and identify missing clinical, technical, or risk evidence before it delays authorization. Give leadership a clearer view of submission readiness, unresolved dependencies, and the evidence required to move a device toward market.

Quality assurance

Move from audit preparation to continuous readiness

Continuously evaluate controlled documents, design-history evidence, manufacturing records, CAPAs, nonconformances, supplier files, validation records, and audit responses. Identify missing evidence and traceability breaks earlier—reducing remediation pressure before FDA inspections, ISO audits, MDSAP assessments, and supplier audits.

Lifecycle risk

Detect regulatory and quality impact before it spreads

Connect regulatory changes, complaints, adverse events, field failures, supplier signals, and recurring nonconformances to affected devices, risk controls, evidence packages, and quality-system processes. Help teams protect product safety, market continuity, regulatory standing, and confidence across the device portfolio.

Every requirement becomes traceable. Every evidence gap becomes visible. Every lifecycle decision becomes better informed.
Internal buy-in

What MedTech executives and compliance leaders will ask

These are the questions that arise when medical device companies move from document management to agentic lifecycle governance.

How does this create measurable business value?
Automatan helps reduce the manual analysis behind regulatory strategy, submission readiness, QMS review, audit preparation, standards comparison, and post-market assessment. The business case can be measured through review-cycle time, audit-preparation effort, submission gaps identified before filing, CAPA cycle time, regulatory-change assessment time, evidence reuse across markets, and the cost of delayed market access or remediation.
How is this different from an eQMS or document management system?
Traditional systems store controlled documents, route approvals, manage training, and maintain records. Automatan analyzes the relationships between requirements, documents, controls, evidence, quality events, and device risks. The eQMS records the process. Automatan helps determine whether the available evidence supports the regulatory and quality decision.
Will AI replace Regulatory, Quality, or Clinical professionals?
No. AI agents perform analysis-heavy work: searching, comparing, mapping, tracing, checking completeness, and surfacing inconsistencies. Qualified experts retain regulatory judgment, quality authority, clinical interpretation, submission responsibility, and approval accountability.
Can AI be trusted with regulated documentation?
Agent outputs can include source citations, requirement references, document versions, evidence mappings, confidence indicators, and defined human-review requirements. This allows experts to inspect how a finding was produced before it influences a regulated decision.
Can agents understand the complexity of our specific device?
Yes. Agents can be configured around the device’s intended use, classification, technology, risk profile, regulatory pathway, clinical strategy, product architecture, quality processes, and target markets. The analysis remains bounded by the device-specific documentation, approved reference sources, and workflow criteria provided by your organization.
Can Automatan support multiple standards and markets?
Yes. Agents can compare requirements across frameworks such as ISO 13485, FDA QMSR, MDSAP, EU MDR, and IVDR—identifying overlaps, differences, evidence portability, and market-specific gaps. Your experts remain responsible for confirming applicability and approving the resulting compliance strategy.

Run the medical device lifecycle with AI agents.

We’ll map your regulatory, quality, clinical, audit, and post-market workflows—then identify where specialized agents can create the greatest impact on market access, evidence readiness, compliance assurance, and product risk. Thirty minutes. Your device lifecycle. A practical path to AI-native MedTech operations.

Typically responds within 4 hours